Jack Ellison King. King of Almost.
He almost made valedictorian.
He almost made varsity.
He almost got the girl . . .
When Jack and Kate meet at a party, bonding until sunrise over their mutual love of Froot Loops and their favorite flicks, Jack knows he’s falling—hard. Soon she’s meeting his best friends, Jillian and Franny, and Kate wins them over as easily as she did Jack. Jack’s curse of almost is finally over.
But this love story is . . . complicated. It is an almost happily ever after. Because Kate dies. And their story should end there. Yet Kate’s death sends Jack back to the beginning, the moment they first meet, and Kate’s there again. Beautiful, radiant Kate. Healthy, happy, and charming as ever. Jack isn’t sure if he’s losing his mind. Still, if he has a chance to prevent Kate’s death, he’ll take it. Even if that means believing in time travel. However, Jack will learn that his actions are not without consequences. And when one choice turns deadly for someone else close to him, he has to figure out what he’s willing to do—and let go—to save the people he loves.
I’d been interested in reading Opposite of Always ever since I saw it on a list of 2019 debuts, and I was pretty excited when I saw that the audiobook was available through my library. After reading it, you could say I’m angry angry, because this book was some nonsense.
Look, I understand that you need to suspend some disbelief in a lot of novels. I also understand that you need to suspend a lot of disbelief when it comes to time travel novels. But this book? There is not enough disbelief in the entire world for me to suspend and have this book make any sense.
But I’ll get there.
First I want to talk about everything else.
I guess I’m going to start with what seems to be a trend in YA literature these days — romantic relationships between high school and college students. I know that it happens all the time, both in real life and in fiction, but for me, there’s no way around it. It’s creepy. Even if it’s just a one-year difference in age, there is a huge difference in maturity between someone who lives with their parents and someone who is in college, living in a dorm, away from home.
The second thing I want to talk about is the pacing. This book is 464 pages. That is insanely long for a YA contemporary. It’s also about twice as long as it needs to be since so much of the book is repetitive. And I was bored the entire way through. It’s just one irrelevant thing after another happening, and even when relevant things happen, they don’t make sense.
And now we get to my third point — the blatant medical inaccuracies in this book.
So, you really expect me to believe that a doctor has the cure for sickle cell anemia just hidden away in his office and the FDA hasn’t come looking for it? You really expect me to believe that a doctor would violate HIPAA just because he feels bad for some random kid who has an emotional investment in a college student’s case? You really expect me to believe that this doctor happily takes calls from this random kid to discuss the specifics of his super secret super expensive sickle cell treatment? That’s not how medicine works, and the way that Kate describes the financial piece of her treatments? That’s not how insurance works. As the former billing manager of a medical office and someone who now literally works for a major insurance company, I think I’d know. I just read the author’s bio and saw that he’s actually a registered nurse and I am even more upset, because he should know better.So back to what I said at the beginning about suspending disbelief.
I’m not sure what’s going on with the random time travel in YA books recently, but I, for one, am sick of it. What was the point of it in this book? Jack repeats the same three months over and over again so that he, the high school student, can try to save Kate’s life. Because, yes, the high school student is clearly going to save Kate when a bunch of trained physicians could not.
I feel like, if you want to write a book like this, with the love interest being very sick and on the verge of dying, you have to be very careful to not come across as a rip-off of hundreds of similar books that have come before you. Personally, when I see the words “because Kate dies” in a synopsis, I’m already rolling my eyes. This particular plot has been done so many times that it’s going to be hard to make it unique. Similarly, the “living the same day over and over until you get it right” thing has been done to death. There was nothing particularly new or interesting about the time loops in this book, so it really just came across like the author knew that books about sick kids, books about time travel, and YA contemporary romance are selling well, so he decided to combine them all together to make a surefire hit.
Also…
When Kate’s dad lectures Jack that he needs to break up with Kate because she’s dying, I did two things. First, I rolled my eyes, because how many times has a YA dad told his daughter’s boyfriend to break up with her because he just didn’t like their relationship? But, second, it kind of came across like, “Yeah, Kate’s dying. Let’s take away this one piece of happiness she has while she’s still on this planet.” Like, honestly. Where is the logic here?All in all, I felt that this book played out very stereotypically. Everything that happened was predictable, even the twists. The fantastical time-travel aspect kind of comes out of nowhere and isn’t particularly well-done. The book is overly long and I just couldn’t bring myself to care about the characters or what happened to them. There was a ton of odd dialogue and weird choices, like Jack’s best friend’s father being referred to as “the coupon.” (What??)
I was excited about this one, but now I’m just disappointed.
Have you read Opposite of Always? Do you know of any books that did these tropes well?
Let’s talk in the comments!
Find me all over the internet: Goodreads | Twitter | Bloglovin’
oih, sorry for you and the writer…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was interested in the Groundhog Day aspect of the description. I know it’s a well used trope, but I do like it, but then high school student saves sickle cell anemia with medical inaccuracies? Nope. Nope nope nope. I’m mad just reading your review of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Honestly, I probably could have been okay with this book if not for the medical inaccuracies! Like I said in my review, I can suspend a lot of disbelief if I need to, but this was just too much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The only thing worse than a waste-of-time book is a really long waste-of-time book. Thanks for the warning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hate when I think a book is going to be good and it ends up not being that great. I’m not a big fan of that trope either. Sad that it didn’t end up being that good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was excited too, and although I have not read it, your review is really well written and convincing! I rolled my eye at the medical things you mentioned without reading the book, so it just may not be for me
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you! If it bothered me as a person with a background in just medical administration, I would think it would be really annoying for you as a doctor!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe I will end up skipping it although I am kind of interested in the concept!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d love to hear your thoughts if you end up reading it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
okay I am so torn, part of me still wants to read it but maybe with a low threshold for DNFing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amen and.preach because this is becoming the most consistent gripe across the negative reviews I write. And I read comics. If I can buy into time travel in Endgame, the walking dead and umbrella Academy? Seriously. It doesnt take much. But dont be lazy. Man. You gotta give me SOMETHING.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly! This is happening so often recently!
LikeLike
yeesh thanks for the heads up
LikeLiked by 1 person